Government of India vs GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited Advocate - RUBAINA S KHATOON — WA/353/2026

Case under Airports Authority of India Act Section 15. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010178732026

e-Filing Number

08-03-2026

Filing Number

WA/12934/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/353/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MATTERS ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Airports Authority of India Act Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of India

    Adv. N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.The Director (Security Section)

  3. 3.Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited Advocate - RUBAINA S KHATOON

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    Summary: In Writ Appeal No. 353 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana, the interlocutory application (I.A. No. 2 of 2026) seeking to dispense with filing a certified copy of the impugned order was allowed. The appellants were granted two weeks to file an additional affidavit explaining the delay in filing the appeal, with the respondent given two weeks thereafter to file objections. The case is adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/353/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Appeal No. 353 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana, the interlocutory application (I.A. No. 2 of 2026) seeking to dispense with filing a certified copy of the impugned order was allowed. The appellants were granted two weeks to file an additional affidavit explaining the delay in filing the appeal, with the respondent given two weeks thereafter to file objections. The case is adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case