M/s. M.S. Developers vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION — WP/8917/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010177842026
Filing Number
WP/12869/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8917/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Pulla Karthik
Coram
Pulla Karthik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. M.S. Developers
Adv. SAINI ARAVIND
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION
-
2.The Executive Engineer
Adv. GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
4.The District Registrar
-
5.The Joint Sub-Registrar
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
Pulla Karthik
-
30-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
Summary: The Telangana High Court granted an interim direction allowing the Joint Sub-Registrar to receive, register, and release an Agreement of Sale-cum-General Power of Attorney for land in Siddipet District, despite the property being partially included in a prohibited properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. The court's order was conditional on the land falling within the non-prohibited remaining extent of the survey number and was guided by the Supreme Court's ruling in K.Gopi v. The Sub-Registrar. The matter was posted for further hearing on 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Admission (Stamps And Registration )
Pulla Karthik
-
25-Mar-2026
Pulla KarthikView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8917/2026
Summary: The Telangana High Court granted an interim direction allowing the Joint Sub-Registrar to receive, register, and release an Agreement of Sale-cum-General Power of Attorney for land in Siddipet District, despite the property being partially included in a prohibited properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. The court's order was conditional on the land falling within the non-prohibited remaining extent of the survey number and was guided by the Supreme Court's ruling in K.Gopi v. The Sub-Registrar. The matter was posted for further hearing on 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts