M/s Shadnagar Developers vs Spectra India Eco Projects Pvt Ltd. Advocate - ROHIT POGULA — COMCA/20/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 37. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010177032026

Filing Number

COMCA/12814/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

COMCA/20/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

OS Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Shadnagar Developers

    Adv. V SEETHARAMA AVADHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Spectra India Eco Projects Pvt Ltd. Advocate - ROHIT POGULA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: COMCA No.20 of 2026 The Telangana High Court heard Shadnagar Developers' appeal against an order restraining the company from alienating or encumbering property pending arbitration constitution. The court, noting both parties had already initiated arbitrator appointment steps, decided to appoint an arbitrator in the appeal itself rather than adjudicate the underlying commercial dispute, advancing the arbitration process. The matter was listed for further hearing on 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COMCA/20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COMCA No.20 of 2026 The Telangana High Court heard Shadnagar Developers' appeal against an order restraining the company from alienating or encumbering property pending arbitration constitution. The court, noting both parties had already initiated arbitrator appointment steps, decided to appoint an arbitrator in the appeal itself rather than adjudicate the underlying commercial dispute, advancing the arbitration process. The matter was listed for further hearing on 09.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case