ShaikShabbir, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3998/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010172092026

Filing Number

CRLP/4732/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/3998/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ShaikShabbir,

    Adv. KIRAN PALAKURTHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    The Telangana High Court granted bail to accused Shaik Shabbir, who was charged under Section 69 of BNS (2023) for allegedly making false marriage promises to an orphan woman resulting in a child. The court found that prosecution witnesses had already been examined, and considering the overall circumstances and duration of incarceration since February 2026, bail was appropriate, subject to conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and weekly reporting to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3998/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court granted bail to accused Shaik Shabbir, who was charged under Section 69 of BNS (2023) for allegedly making false marriage promises to an orphan woman resulting in a child. The court found that prosecution witnesses had already been examined, and considering the overall circumstances and duration of incarceration since February 2026, bail was appropriate, subject to conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and weekly reporting to police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case