Eramayana Pochaiah vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/8720/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 30th March 2026.
CNR: HBHC010166732026
Filing Number
WP/12077/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8720/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO DISPOSSES ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Eramayana Pochaiah
Adv. J RAJESWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
4.The Tahasildar
-
5.Gouraipally Gram Panchyat
Adv. PRADEEP REDDY KATTA (SC FOR TG ZILLA PARISHAD)
-
6.The Executive Engineer
Adv. CHITTAM BUCHI REDDY (SC FOR TELANGANA HOUSING BOARD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
25-Mar-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
The Telangana High Court in W.P. No.8720 of 2026 adjourned the hearing to 30.03.2026 after the Telangana State Housing Board clarified it has no concern with the disputed land in Survey No.185, Gouraipally Village, Siddipet District. The Assistant Government Pleader was granted time to obtain instructions from the Revenue department before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
24-Mar-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8720/2026
The Telangana High Court in W.P. No.8720 of 2026 adjourned the hearing to 30.03.2026 after the Telangana State Housing Board clarified it has no concern with the disputed land in Survey No.185, Gouraipally Village, Siddipet District. The Assistant Government Pleader was granted time to obtain instructions from the Revenue department before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts