The Warden AND Correspondent, vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR LABOUR, ,V R MACHAVARAM — WP/31621/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Mar-2012

CNR: HBHC010162912011

Filing Number

WP/151736/2011

Filing Date

18-Oct-2011

Registration No

WP/31621/2011

Registration Date

29-Nov-2011

Judge

Juvvadi Sridevi

Coram

Juvvadi Sridevi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

LABOUR MATTERS ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Warden AND Correspondent,

    Adv. CH SAMSON BABU

  2. 2.The Management,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR LABOUR, ,V R MACHAVARAM

  2. 2.The Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act

    Adv. V UMA DEVI

  3. 3.P. Jayakar Premnath

    Adv. P V SURYANARAYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Juvvadi Sridevi

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Juvvadi SrideviView PDF

  17. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao

  18. 30-Dec-2025

    Namavarapu Rajeshwar RaoView PDF

  19. 30-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 07-Mar-2012

    B.chandra KumarView PDF

  21. 18-Oct-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/31621/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court dismissed the school management's writ petition challenging the gratuity order, holding that the school's own 2003 circular acknowledging commitment to pay gratuity estopped them from denying the teacher's entitlement. The court directed the school to pay Rs. 2,93,685/- gratuity with interest within two months, rejecting the school's technical argument that the teacher should claim only under the A.P. Education Act rather than the Gratuity Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case