Yalavarthi Naresh Deepak vs Koganti Praveen Kumar Advocate - S. RAM REDDY — WP/7900/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010161142026
Filing Number
WP/11680/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/7900/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Surepalli Nanda
Coram
Surepalli Nanda
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Yalavarthi Naresh Deepak
Adv. M PRATHEEK REDDY
-
2.Venkata Subramanyam Chittala
Respondent(s)
-
1.Koganti Praveen Kumar Advocate - S. RAM REDDY
-
2.Sateesh Chandra Anne
Adv. RAJASEKHAR SIMMA
-
3.M/s. Hill County Villa Owners Mutually Aided Cooperative Society
-
4.Sridevi Chitturi
-
5.Kayathi Rajender Reddy
-
6.District Cooperative Officer (DCO)
Adv. GP FOR COOPERATION
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Admission
Surepalli Nanda
-
31-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
Summary: In W.P. No. 7900 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana, the case was adjourned to 01.04.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel, M. Pratheek Reddy. Both the petitioner's and respondents' counsel were duly informed of the adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Admission (Corporation)
Surepalli Nanda
-
24-Mar-2026
Admission (Corporation)
Surepalli Nanda
-
17-Mar-2026
Admission (Corporation)
Surepalli Nanda
-
16-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Surepalli NandaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7900/2026
Summary: In W.P. No. 7900 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana, the case was adjourned to 01.04.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel, M. Pratheek Reddy. Both the petitioner's and respondents' counsel were duly informed of the adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts