G. Bal Narasimha Reddy vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING — WP/7494/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010153402026

Filing Number

WP/11150/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7494/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Surepalli Nanda

Coram

Surepalli Nanda

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO RELEASE OF AMOUNT ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G. Bal Narasimha Reddy

    Adv. ALLAM RAMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

  2. 2.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer

  5. 5.The Deputy Executive Engineer

  6. 6.The District Treasury Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

    Summary: The Telangana High Court directed the State Finance Department to release Rs. 24,31,475 in admitted and approved payments to contractor G. Bal Narasimha Reddy for completed work on a Mini Tank Bund beautification project within three weeks. The court relied on settled legal precedents holding that non-payment of undisputed bills by the State violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and that writ jurisdiction applies even to contractual disputes when the State acts arbitrarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission (Finance and Planning)

    Surepalli Nanda

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7494/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Telangana High Court directed the State Finance Department to release Rs. 24,31,475 in admitted and approved payments to contractor G. Bal Narasimha Reddy for completed work on a Mini Tank Bund beautification project within three weeks. The court relied on settled legal precedents holding that non-payment of undisputed bills by the State violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and that writ jurisdiction applies even to contractual disputes when the State acts arbitrarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case