Erra Raju alias Yerra Raju, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3993/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010146602026

Filing Number

CRLP/3974/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/3993/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Erra Raju alias Yerra Raju,

    Adv. RAMU MUCHAKURTHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court granted bail to Erra Raju, accused of rape under Section 376(2)(n) IPC, considering his prolonged judicial custody since January 2026, completion of investigation, and the 16-year delay in filing the complaint (2010-2026). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and required appearance before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3993/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court granted bail to Erra Raju, accused of rape under Section 376(2)(n) IPC, considering his prolonged judicial custody since January 2026, completion of investigation, and the 16-year delay in filing the complaint (2010-2026). The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and required appearance before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case