Shalini Boyamotla vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/7059/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010143492026

Filing Number

WP/10459/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7059/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HABEAS CORPUS ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shalini Boyamotla

    Adv. CHADA SRIHARSHTHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.The Regional Passport Office

  3. 3.Foreigners Regional Registration Office

  4. 4.Consulate General of India- Seattle

  5. 5.Bharath Kumar Pogul

    Adv. U SHANTHI BHUSHAN RAO

  6. 6.State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR HOME

  7. 7.Director General of Police

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Telangana found prima facie contempt of court against the respondent for violating a prior order (23.03.2026) requiring minimum 15-minute video calls between the petitioner and children. The Advocate Commissioner's report confirmed the respondent was not cooperating and was present beside the children, causing them to disconnect calls prematurely. The court directed the respondent's counsel to ensure compliance with the 15-minute call duration or face serious contempt consequences, with the Advocate Commissioner to continue monitoring. The matter is adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  8. 13-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  14. 09-Mar-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

  15. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7059/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Telangana found prima facie contempt of court against the respondent for violating a prior order (23.03.2026) requiring minimum 15-minute video calls between the petitioner and children. The Advocate Commissioner's report confirmed the respondent was not cooperating and was present beside the children, causing them to disconnect calls prematurely. The court directed the respondent's counsel to ensure compliance with the 15-minute call duration or face serious contempt consequences, with the Advocate Commissioner to continue monitoring. The matter is adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case