Parveen Begum, vs State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3160/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010138502026

Filing Number

CRLP/3739/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/3160/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parveen Begum,

    Adv. BHAVANI SANKAR N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    The Telangana High Court allowed an interlocutory application on 31.03.2026 to clarify its previous order dated 18.03.2026 in Criminal Petition No. 3160 of 2026. The court modified the bail surrender directions by replacing "trial Court" with "appropriate concerned Court" and directing the concerned trial court to consider the bail application at the earliest, ensuring clarity on the correct court jurisdiction for the petitioner's surrender and bail proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    K. Sujana

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court allowed an interlocutory application on 31.03.2026 to clarify its previous order dated 18.03.2026 in Criminal Petition No. 3160 of 2026. The court modified the bail surrender directions by replacing "trial Court" with "appropriate concerned Court" and directing the concerned trial court to consider the bail application at the earliest, ensuring clarity on the correct court jurisdiction for the petitioner's surrender and bail proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case