K. KrishnaiahGoud, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3161/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480 & 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HBHC010137192026
Filing Number
CRLP/3692/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/3161/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K. KrishnaiahGoud,
Adv. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY
-
2.K. Praveen Kumar Goud,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to two accused (K. Krishnaiah Goud and another) in an NDPS drug trafficking case, finding their period of incarceration sufficient despite allegations of involvement in illegal Alprazolam distribution. The court imposed stringent conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, weekly police reporting, and compliance with bail provisions, balancing the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation against the petitioners' right to liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
For Orders
K. Sujana
-
18-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
16-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
12-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
05-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/3161/2026
Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to two accused (K. Krishnaiah Goud and another) in an NDPS drug trafficking case, finding their period of incarceration sufficient despite allegations of involvement in illegal Alprazolam distribution. The court imposed stringent conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, weekly police reporting, and compliance with bail provisions, balancing the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation against the petitioners' right to liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts