MinigantiLakshmanGoud, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480 & 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HBHC010137142026
Filing Number
CRLP/3691/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/3103/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MinigantiLakshmanGoud,
Adv. RETTALA BALRAJ GOUD
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Case Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to Miniganti Lakshman Goud (accused No. 26) in an NDPS case involving illegal Alprazolam manufacturing and distribution. The court found that while the petitioner allegedly purchased 10 grams of Alprazolam weekly—constituting an intermediate quantity—the charges were based primarily on inadmissible confessional statements of co-accused without direct recovery from his possession or independent corroboration. The petitioner was released on bail subject to executing a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and weekly reporting to police for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
For Orders
K. Sujana
-
24-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
16-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
12-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
05-Mar-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/3103/2026
Case Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to Miniganti Lakshman Goud (accused No. 26) in an NDPS case involving illegal Alprazolam manufacturing and distribution. The court found that while the petitioner allegedly purchased 10 grams of Alprazolam weekly—constituting an intermediate quantity—the charges were based primarily on inadmissible confessional statements of co-accused without direct recovery from his possession or independent corroboration. The petitioner was released on bail subject to executing a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and weekly reporting to police for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts