Chowtipalli Venkatesh, vs State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/10971/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HBHC010086592026
Filing Number
WP/6407/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/10971/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
POLICE PROTECTION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chowtipalli Venkatesh,
Adv. P SWAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.Director General of Police,
-
3.Commissioner of Police,
-
4.Station House Officer,
-
5.Station House Officer,
-
6.State of Andhra Pradesh,
Adv. B RAJESHWAR REDDY (G.P. FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH)
-
7.Director General of Police,
-
8.Superintendent of Police,
-
9.Station House Officer,
-
10.Shanth Kumar Veedhi,
-
11.Mahesh Mylabathula,
-
12.Uppalapati Mahesh,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
Case Summary: WP/10971/2026 The Telangana High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Chowtipalli Venkatesh against the State of Telangana and police officials. On 08.06.2026, the court granted an adjournment at the petitioner's counsel's request, citing that the arguing counsel was out of station, with consent from the respondent's counsel. The case was listed for hearing the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Admission
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
-
13-Apr-2026
P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10971/2026
Case Summary: WP/10971/2026 The Telangana High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Chowtipalli Venkatesh against the State of Telangana and police officials. On 08.06.2026, the court granted an adjournment at the petitioner's counsel's request, citing that the arguing counsel was out of station, with consent from the respondent's counsel. The case was listed for hearing the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts