Srinivas vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and 2 others Advocate - G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY (SC FOR GHMC SERILINGAMPALLY AND SECUNDERABAD ZONES AND HEAD OFFICE CASES) — WP/2279/2020
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010043512020
Filing Number
WP/3290/2020
Filing Date
03-Feb-2020
Registration No
WP/2279/2020
Registration Date
04-Feb-2020
Judge
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
Coram
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Srinivas
Adv. S MIR MASOOD ALI KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and 2 others Advocate - G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY (SC FOR GHMC SERILINGAMPALLY AND SECUNDERABAD ZONES AND HEAD OFFICE CASES)
-
2.The Assistant City Town Planner
Adv. K RAVINDER REDDY (SC FOR GHMC)
-
3.E.Pradeep
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
-
23-Apr-2026
Laxmi Narayana AlishettyView PDF
On 23.04.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned W.P.No.2279 of 2020 to 05.05.2026 for dismissal, noting that the petitioner failed to appear while the Standing Counsel for GHMC was present. The court's action suggests the petition may be dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Admission
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
-
10-Apr-2026
Laxmi Narayana AlishettyView PDF
-
19-Feb-2020
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
P.keshava Rao
-
05-Feb-2020
P.keshava RaoView PDF
-
05-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2279/2020
On 23.04.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned W.P.No.2279 of 2020 to 05.05.2026 for dismissal, noting that the petitioner failed to appear while the Standing Counsel for GHMC was present. The court's action suggests the petition may be dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts