Smt. G. Vanitha vs Mr. Gopaiah Lakumalla — CC/341/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10TO12. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010037002026

Filing Number

CC/2863/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

CC/341/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CC ( 2 )

Sub-Category

TSSEB (MISC.MATTERS) ( 101 )

Judicial Branch

OS Section

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10TO12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. G. Vanitha

    Adv. KANDURI KOUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Gopaiah Lakumalla

  2. 2.Mr. Subba Reddy

  3. 3.Mr. Ramachary

    Adv. N SREEDHAR REDDY ( SC FOR TGSPDCL)

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    The High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, in C.C.No.341 of 2026, ordered on 08.04.2026 that the case be adjourned and listed for 22.04.2026. The court granted the petitioner's counsel's request to substitute the officers arrayed as respondents in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    For Appearance

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CC/341/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, in C.C.No.341 of 2026, ordered on 08.04.2026 that the case be adjourned and listed for 22.04.2026. The court granted the petitioner's counsel's request to substitute the officers arrayed as respondents in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case