Rajesh Kumar Mayiladurai Nagarajan, vs The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — CRLP/654/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 05th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010030272026

Filing Number

CRLP/660/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLP/654/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

05-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Kumar Mayiladurai Nagarajan,

    Adv. M AMARNATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted the extension of time requested in Interim Application No.1 of 2026 in Criminal Petition No.654 of 2026, dated 13.04.2026. The court found the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit sufficient to justify the extension and accordingly ordered the application as prayed for by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    K. Sujana

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/654/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted the extension of time requested in Interim Application No.1 of 2026 in Criminal Petition No.654 of 2026, dated 13.04.2026. The court found the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit sufficient to justify the extension and accordingly ordered the application as prayed for by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case