Shri Reddy Sangaiah vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WA/68/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 27th January 2026.
CNR: HBHC010019502026
Filing Number
WA/1552/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
WA/68/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP. ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
27-Jan-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri Reddy Sangaiah
Adv. R A ACHUTHANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
2.The Commissioner
Adv. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY (SC FOR GHMC SERILINGAMPALLY AND SECUNDERABAD ZONES AND HEAD OFFICE CASES)
-
3.The Assistant City Planner
-
4.The Deputy Director
-
5.Smt. K. Mamatha
Adv. S SRIDHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
The Telangana High Court dismissed the appellant's interlocutory application seeking modification of the judgment dated 27.01.2026, finding no grounds to alter the observations made in paragraph 7. The court held that the disputed observation was neutral and not directed against either party, leaving it to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation to decide on removal of the unauthorized structure based on the outcome of the regularization application and any pending apex court matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jan-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
For Admission
Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar
-
19-Jan-2026
Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/68/2026
The Telangana High Court dismissed the appellant's interlocutory application seeking modification of the judgment dated 27.01.2026, finding no grounds to alter the observations made in paragraph 7. The court held that the disputed observation was neutral and not directed against either party, leaving it to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation to decide on removal of the unauthorized structure based on the outcome of the regularization application and any pending apex court matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts