J. SUBRAMANYAM, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT AND 11 OTHERS vs PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMIN., HYD AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,GP FOR REVENUE,GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS,GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV — WP/26826/2016
Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010007902016
Filing Number
WP/143420/2016
Filing Date
09-Aug-2016
Registration No
WP/26826/2016
Registration Date
09-Aug-2016
Judge
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Coram
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP. ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J. SUBRAMANYAM, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT AND 11 OTHERS
Adv. MOHD ZIA UL HAQ
-
2.Y.Suguna,
-
3.Shaik Fakruddin,
-
4.Shaik Waheeduddin,
-
5.Shaik Akbaruddin,
-
6.Abdul Raheem Arif,
-
7.Dr.Abdul Kaleem,
-
8.Ahtesham Kaleem,
-
9.Mujtaba Kaleem,
-
10.Dr.K.S.Dhan Raj,
-
11.Dr.Benher Ben Raj,
-
12.M.Guruswamy,
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMIN., HYD AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, ,GP FOR REVENUE,GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS,GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
-
2.The State of Telangana,
-
3.The Mahaboobnagar Municipality,
Adv. KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA (SC MUNCIPALITIES)
-
4.The District Collector,
-
5.The Superintendent Engineer,
-
6.The Executive Engineer,
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF
On 10.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the case to 15.06.2026 at the petitioner's counsel's request and removed the matter from the "For Dismissal" caption, allowing the petition to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Dismissal(specially Identified Cases)
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
-
23-Sep-2021
Adjourned
A.abhishek Reddy
-
09-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2016
Case filed
Registration No. WP/26826/2016
On 10.06.2026, the High Court of Telangana adjourned the case to 15.06.2026 at the petitioner's counsel's request and removed the matter from the "For Dismissal" caption, allowing the petition to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts