D. Sailoo vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SPORTS — WA/333/2026
Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HBHC010006792026
Filing Number
WA/541/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
WA/333/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 27 )
Sub-Category
SPORTS AUTHORITY ( 82 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D. Sailoo
Adv. N GANGADHAR
-
2.Sri M Rama Koteswar Rao
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SPORTS
-
2.Indian Weight Lifting Federation
-
3.Sri. Kumbasi Subramanya,
-
4.Sri. Shaik Ramzan Ali,
-
5.Sri. K. Shoban Babu,
-
6.Sri. S.H. Annade Gowda,
-
7.Smt. Mukiri Sruthi
Adv. GOURAVULU ANIL KUMAR
-
8.Sri. Kyathi Paladugu
-
9.Sri. M. Krishna Murthy
-
10.Sri. Puspala Venkata Ramana
-
11.Sri. Saidulu Gosukona
-
12.Sri. M. Hanumantha Raju
-
13.Spandana Challa
-
14.Sri. M. Sudhakar
-
15.Sri. Kumaraswamy Gowra
-
16.Sri Mallepally Anand Kumar
-
17.Sri Chevuru Ankaiah
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Admission
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
-
31-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
The High Court for the State of Telangana in W.A. No. 333 of 2026 adjourned the matter to 13.04.2026. The court directed appellants' counsel to supply appeal papers to respondent No. 2's counsel by the next day and ordered counsel for respondents 2 and 7 to file vakalatnama before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Admission (Fresh Matters)
Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin
-
23-Mar-2026
Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/333/2026
The High Court for the State of Telangana in W.A. No. 333 of 2026 adjourned the matter to 13.04.2026. The court directed appellants' counsel to supply appeal papers to respondent No. 2's counsel by the next day and ordered counsel for respondents 2 and 7 to file vakalatnama before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts