M.Ravinder Nath vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II — WP/326/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 06th January 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010003542025

Filing Number

WP/251/2025

Filing Date

03-Jan-2025

Registration No

WP/326/2025

Registration Date

03-Jan-2025

Judge

Pulla Karthik

Coram

Pulla Karthik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

06-Jan-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.Ravinder Nath

    Adv. P UGENDER REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II

  2. 2.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts,

  3. 3.The District Treasury Officer,

  4. 4.The Sub-Treasury Officer,

  5. 5.The Commissioner of Collegiate Education,

    Adv. GP FOR SERVICES I

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    This is a proceeding sheet from Telangana High Court (WP No. 326 of 2025) showing a procedural order dated 10.04.2026, not a final judgment. The court directed the petitioner's counsel to supply material papers to the respondent's counsel and adjourned the case to 24.04.2026 for filing counter-affidavits, indicating the case is still in its preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2025

    Pulla KarthikView PDF

  4. 06-Jan-2025

    Admission (Finance and Planning)

    Pulla Karthik

  5. 03-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/326/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a proceeding sheet from Telangana High Court (WP No. 326 of 2025) showing a procedural order dated 10.04.2026, not a final judgment. The court directed the petitioner's counsel to supply material papers to the respondent's counsel and adjourned the case to 24.04.2026 for filing counter-affidavits, indicating the case is still in its preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case