ABDUL RASHID @ A. R. BABU vs TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED — SLP(C) No. 3835/2026

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Matters Arising Out of Orders Passed Under Sections 9 and 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section IX. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010047712026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 3835/2026

Diary Number

4771/2026

Order Date

24-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Matters arising out of orders passed under Sections 9 and 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL RASHID @ A. R. BABU

    Adv. SHASHWAT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. ALAPATI SAHITHYA KRISHNA [R-1]

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 3835/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In SLP (C) No. 3835/2026, the Supreme Court heard the petition of Abdul Rashid @ A.R. Babu & another against Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited on 02-02-2026. The Court ordered that the matter be re-listed before a different Bench where Justice Atul S. Chandurkar would not be a member, indicating a recusal by one of the sitting judges. No substantive decision on the merits was made at this hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case