UNION OF INDIA vs KANWAR SINGH — SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-2-2026)

Case under Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces : Slps and Writ Petitions Pertaining to Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces, Including Recruitment/ Appointment, Court Martial, Disciplinary Action, Pension, Emoluments, Salary and Other Incidental Matters Section IV-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010044792026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-2-2026)

Diary Number

4479/2026

Order Date

13-May-2026

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Armed Forces and ParaMilitary Forces : SLPs and Writ Petitions pertaining to armed forces and paramilitary forces, including recruitment/ appointment, court martial, disciplinary action, pension, emoluments, salary and other incidental matters Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANWAR SINGH

Case History

  1. 20-May-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  2. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No.(Verified On 7-2-2026)

  4. PDF 1View PDF

  5. PDF 2View PDF

  6. PDF 3View PDF

  7. PDF 4View PDF

  8. PDF 5View PDF

  9. PDF 6View PDF

  10. PDF 7View PDF

  11. PDF 8View PDF

  12. PDF 9View PDF

  13. PDF 10View PDF

  14. PDF 11View PDF

  15. PDF 12View PDF

  16. PDF 13View PDF

  17. PDF 14View PDF

  18. PDF 15View PDF

  19. PDF 16View PDF

  20. PDF 17View PDF

  21. PDF 18View PDF

  22. PDF 19View PDF

  23. PDF 20View PDF

  24. PDF 21View PDF

  25. PDF 22View PDF

  26. PDF 23View PDF

  27. PDF 24View PDF

  28. PDF 25View PDF

  29. PDF 26View PDF

  30. PDF 27View PDF

  31. PDF 28View PDF

  32. PDF 29View PDF

  33. PDF 30View PDF

  34. PDF 31View PDF

  35. PDF 32View PDF

  36. PDF 33View PDF

  37. PDF 34View PDF

  38. PDF 35View PDF

  39. PDF 36View PDF

  40. PDF 37View PDF

  41. PDF 38View PDF

  42. PDF 39View PDF

  43. PDF 40View PDF

  44. PDF 41View PDF

  45. PDF 42View PDF

  46. PDF 43View PDF

  47. PDF 44View PDF

  48. PDF 45View PDF

  49. PDF 46View PDF

  50. PDF 47View PDF

  51. PDF 48View PDF

  52. PDF 49View PDF

  53. PDF 50View PDF

  54. PDF 51View PDF

  55. PDF 52View PDF

  56. PDF 53View PDF

  57. PDF 54View PDF

  58. PDF 55View PDF

  59. PDF 56View PDF

  60. PDF 57View PDF

  61. PDF 58View PDF

  62. PDF 59View PDF

  63. PDF 60View PDF

  64. PDF 61View PDF

  65. PDF 62View PDF

  66. PDF 63View PDF

  67. PDF 64View PDF

  68. PDF 65View PDF

  69. PDF 66View PDF

  70. PDF 67View PDF

  71. PDF 68View PDF

  72. PDF 69View PDF

  73. PDF 70View PDF

  74. PDF 71View PDF

  75. PDF 72View PDF

  76. PDF 73View PDF

  77. PDF 74View PDF

  78. PDF 75View PDF

  79. PDF 76View PDF

  80. PDF 77View PDF

  81. PDF 78View PDF

  82. PDF 79View PDF

  83. PDF 80View PDF

  84. PDF 81View PDF

  85. PDF 82View PDF

  86. PDF 83View PDF

  87. PDF 84View PDF

  88. PDF 85View PDF

  89. PDF 86View PDF

  90. PDF 87View PDF

  91. PDF 88View PDF

  92. PDF 89View PDF

  93. PDF 90View PDF

  94. PDF 91View PDF

  95. PDF 92View PDF

  96. PDF 93View PDF

  97. PDF 94View PDF

  98. PDF 95View PDF

  99. PDF 96View PDF

  100. PDF 97View PDF

  101. PDF 98View PDF

  102. PDF 99View PDF

  103. PDF 100View PDF

  104. PDF 101View PDF

  105. PDF 102View PDF

  106. PDF 103View PDF

  107. PDF 104View PDF

  108. PDF 105View PDF

  109. PDF 106View PDF

  110. PDF 107View PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Appeal Diary No. 3469/2023, the Supreme Court heard the Union of India's appeal against Ex Sep (Clk) Pradip Kumar Singh challenging an Armed Forces Tribunal order dated 16-02-2021. The Court, comprising Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi, heard arguments on four interim applications regarding condonation of delay, exemption from filing certified copies, ex-parte stay, and leave to appeal. The Court directed that the case be listed for further hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case