P VIJAYANAND vs SIVALINGAM SADHAPPAN — SLP(Crl) No. 9112/2026

Case under 1508Misc-criminal Law : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(Slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge,summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation, Etc.) Section II-C. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010037122026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 9112/2026

Diary Number

3712/2026

Order Date

12-May-2026

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1508MISC-Criminal Law : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge,summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation, etc.) Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P VIJAYANAND

    Adv. E. R. SUMATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIVALINGAM SADHAPPAN

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    ROPView PDF

  2. 12-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 9112/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: SLP(Crl) No. 8493/2026

PDF 1
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The document you've provided contains multiple unrelated Supreme Court cases. The specific case you requested (SLP(Crl) No. 009112-2026, P VIJAYANAND v. SIVALINGAM SADHAPPAN, Diary 3712/2026) appears in the first hearing record. Summary of SLP(Crl) No. 009112-2026 Hearing Date: May 12, 2026 Outcome: The Court condoned the delay in refiling. For the main matter (Diary 3712/2026), the Court issued notice and directed it to be tagged with SLP(Crl) No. 8493/2026, indicating the petition would proceed to the merits stage with a return date of July 27, 2026. A related matter (Diary 3708/2026) was dismissed. The petitioner challenged acquittals of accused parties in a cheque-related criminal matter, arguing they were directors involved in company operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case