IN RE BRUNO (SUO MOTO) PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE INACTION OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE MATTER OF PROTECTION OF ANIMAL RIGHTS vs UNION OF INDIA — T.C.(C) No. 33/2026

Case under 20P-environmental Laws Section XVI-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010015152026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

T.C.(C) No. 33/2026

Diary Number

1515/2026

Order Date

19-May-2026

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

20P-Environmental Laws Section XVI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IN RE BRUNO (SUO MOTO) PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE INACTION OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE MATTER OF PROTECTION OF ANIMAL RIGHTS

    Adv. BY COURTS MOTION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  2. 29-Jan-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.C.(C) No. 33/2026

  6. [ 2026 INSC 506 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. [ 2025 INSC 1357 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. [ 2025 INSC 1018 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 08-07-2024, the Supreme Court heard a Special Leave Petition (Diary No. 9352/2024) filed by Conference for Human Rights (India) against the Union of India, challenging a Delhi High Court order dated 18-08-2023. The Court granted permission for the petitioner to appear and argue in person, condoned the delay in filing, and issued notice to respondents. The petitioner was also permitted to serve notice through dasti and via the Central Agency and Standing Counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case