DR. NEHA MAHAJAN vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 3529 - 3535/2022

Case under Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate Appointment, Temporary Appointment, Recruitment,probation and Confirmation, Suspension, Reduction in Rank, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employees Section XIV-A. Status: PENDING.

CNR: SCIN010410642016

PENDING

Filing Date

09-12-2016 12:00 AM

Registration No

C.A. No. 003529 - 003535 / 2022

Diary Number

41064/2016

Order Date

12-03-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Acts & Sections

Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate appointment, temporary appointment, recruitment,probation and confirmation, suspension, reduction in rank, termination, dismissal, removal, retirement, disciplinary proceedings against employees Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

DR. NEHA MAHAJAN

Adv. NATASHA DALMIA[P-1] NATASHA DALMIA[P-2] NATASHA DALMIA[P-3] NATASHA DALMIA[P-4] NATASHA DALMIA[P-5] NATASHA DALMIA[P-6] NATASHA DALMIA[P-7]

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY

Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

12-03-2026

Mention Memo

25-03-2025

Fixed Date by Court

18-10-2024

Ordinary

10-09-2024

Ordinary

16-10-2023

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

05-05-2017 ROP
05-05-2017 Office Report
05-05-2017 ROP
28-04-2017 ROP
28-04-2017 Office Report
28-04-2017 ROP
17-04-2017 ROP
17-04-2017 Office Report
17-04-2017 ROP
10-03-2017 ROP
10-03-2017 Office Report
10-03-2017 ROP
27-02-2017 ROP
27-02-2017 Office Report
27-02-2017 ROP
15-12-2016 ROP
15-12-2016 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

On 12-03-2026, the Supreme Court (Chief Justice and Justices Bagchi and Pancholi) heard IA No. 110587/2025, an early hearing application in Dr. Neha Mahajan's civil appeal against the Union of India (Ministry of Defence). The Court dismissed the early hearing application, finding no sufficient grounds to entertain it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case