THIRU. PADMANABAN vs TMT. A. KAVITHA — SLP(C) No. 10699/2026
Case under Housing and Building-municipal Laws-housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning : Housing and Building- Matters Relating to Municipal Laws, Housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning (other Than Rera) Section XII. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010405272025
Filing Date
24-07-2025 10:44 PM
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 010699 / 2026
Diary Number
40527/2025
Order Date
17-02-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THIRU. PADMANABAN
Adv. RASHMI NANDAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
TMT. A. KAVITHA
Adv. RAHUL SHYAM BHANDARI[R-1] B. KARUNAKARAN[R-3]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
Ordinary
Fixed Date by Court
Ordinary
Fixed Date by Court
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-02-2026 | Ordinary |
| 10-02-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 17-12-2025 | Ordinary |
| 03-12-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 30-10-2025 | Ordinary |
Orders
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 010699/2026 Thiru. Padmanaban v. TMT. A. Kavitha | Heard: 17 February 2026 The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court order that transferred temple administration to the Joint Commissioner (HRCE). The Court found prima facie evidence of encroachment and malfeasance allegations against the petitioner but directed official respondents to conduct a detailed enquiry hearing both parties within eight weeks before making a final decision on temple administration rights. The Court clarified that the High Court's observations would be prima facie in nature and hold no bearing in the subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts