SUNDER LAL AND ORS. ETC ETC. vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. ETC ETC — C.A. No. 844 - 853/2018
Case under Section III-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010400162017
Filing Date
07-12-2017 12:00 AM
Registration No
C.A. No. 000844 - 000853 / 2018
Diary Number
40016/2017
Order Date
02-05-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNDER LAL AND ORS. ETC ETC.
Adv. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-2] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-3] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-4] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-5] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-6] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-7] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-8] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-9] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-10] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-11] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-12] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-13] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-14] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-15] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-16] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-17] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-18] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-19] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-20] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-21] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-22] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-23] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-24] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-25] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-26] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-27] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-28] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-29] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-30] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-31] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-32] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-33] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-34] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-35] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-36] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-37] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-38] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-39] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-40] RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[P-41] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-42] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-43] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-44] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-45] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-46] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-47] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-48] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-49] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-50] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-51] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-52] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-53] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-54] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-55] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-56] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-57] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-58] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-59] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-60] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-61] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-62] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-63] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-64] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-65] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-66] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-67] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-68] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-69] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-70] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-71] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-72] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-73] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-74] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-75] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-76] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-77] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-78] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-79] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-80] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-81] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-82] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-83] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-84] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-85] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-86] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-87] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-88] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-89] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-90] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-91] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-92] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-93] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-94] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-95] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-96] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-97] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-98] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-99] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-100] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-101] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-102] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-103] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-104] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-105] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-106] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-107] SAROJ TRIPATHI[P-108] YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-109] ANKUR YADAV[P-1] SAROJ TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. ETC ETC
Adv. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-3] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-4] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-5] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-6] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-7] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-8] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-9] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-10] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-11] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-12] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-13] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-14] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-15] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-16] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-17] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-18] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-19] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-20] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-21] ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1] ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-22] AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-2]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2023 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 13-10-2022 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 17-12-2021 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 15-11-2021 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 05-01-2021 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Summary: Sunder Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh (C.A. 844-853/2018) The Supreme Court dismissed all civil appeals and special leave petitions on May 2, 2023. The appellants were denied payscales per earlier writ petition directions. However, since ~90% had retired, the Court directed Uttar Pradesh not to recover excess payments already made, while permitting the state to re-fix payscales and pensions with recalculation. Aggrieved appellants may file representations to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts