K.L. SWAMY vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — C.A. No. 3704/2012

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010376822010

Filing Date

24-Nov-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 3704/2012

Diary Number

37682/2010

Order Date

13-Jan-2023

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2023 INSC 28

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.L. SWAMY

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jan-2023

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jan-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  5. 14-Dec-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 14-Dec-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  7. 07-Dec-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Dec-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  9. 01-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Mar-2012
  16. 02-Feb-2012
  17. 05-Dec-2011
  18. 24-Nov-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3704/2012

casestatus.in Summary

K.L. Swamy v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023) Summary: The Supreme Court held that assesses who are "persons other than searched persons" are liable to pay interest under Section 158BFA(1) for late filing of returns under block assessment proceedings, even without notice under Section 158BC and prior to June 1, 1999. However, the Court ruled these assessees are not liable for surcharge under Section 113, overruling prior precedent on that issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case