VIDYA SAGAR INST.OF MENTAL HEL.& NEO.SC. vs SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP . — SLP(C) No. 523/2008
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010371592007
Filing Date
19-Dec-2007
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 523/2008
Diary Number
37159/2007
Order Date
01-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIDYA SAGAR INST.OF MENTAL HEL.& NEO.SC.
Adv. NAVIN CHAWLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP .
Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR RAJENDER PD. SAXENA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
19-Dec-2007
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 523/2008
-
14-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: SLP(C) No. 523/2008 On 01/09/2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by hospitals (including Vidya Sagar Institute and others) against Social Jurist's challenge. The Court upheld that 25% OPD and 10% IPD patients must receive free treatment without any charges, though hospitals may fund this through their own resources, sponsorships, endowments, or donations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts