PANJU MAHAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY THROUGH ITS HON. SECRETARY vs NAUSHAD PANJWANI . — C.A. No. 2815/2012
Case under Housing and Building-municipal Laws-housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning : Housing and Building- Matters Relating to Municipal Laws, Housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning (Other Than Rera) Section III. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010363662011
Filing Date
16-Nov-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 2815/2012
Diary Number
36366/2011
Order Date
23-Jul-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PANJU MAHAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY THROUGH ITS HON. SECRETARY
Adv. KHUSHBOO AAKASH SHETH[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAUSHAD PANJWANI .
Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-2] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3] ISHAAN GEORGE[R-1]
Case History
-
23-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
-
25-Apr-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
24-Apr-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
18-Apr-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale
-
29-Feb-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2815/2012
Summary of C.A. No. 002815/2012 On 23-07-2025, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeals 2815/2012 and 2816/2012 between Panju Mahal Cooperative Society (appellant) and Naushad Panjwani (respondent). The Court adjourned the case and directed that the matters be listed after two weeks, making clear that no further indulgence would be granted beyond this deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts