M/S. MUNJAL SHOWA LTD. MAHESH TANEJA G.M. (FINANCE AND I.T.) vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (DELHI IV) COMMISSIONER — C.A. No. 2576/2010

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010355902008

Filing Date

06-Dec-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 2576/2010

Diary Number

35590/2008

Order Date

23-Sep-2022

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2022 INSC 1008

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. MUNJAL SHOWA LTD. MAHESH TANEJA G.M. (FINANCE AND I.T.)

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (DELHI IV) COMMISSIONER

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Sep-2022

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Sep-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  5. 06-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Sep-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  7. 01-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  8. 04-Nov-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 03-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Jan-2013
  12. 05-Jul-2011
  13. 16-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 06-Dec-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2576/2010

  18. [ 2022 INSC 1008 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals by M/s. Munjal Showa Ltd. and M/s. Friends Trading Co., upholding customs duty demands against them. Both companies had imported goods using forged DEPB (Duty Entitlement Passbook) licenses/scripps to claim duty exemptions. The Court held that since the DEPB documents were fraudulent and void ab initio, the companies must pay the evaded customs duty with interest, and the Department was justified in invoking extended limitation periods. The Court clarified that while buyers' knowledge of fraud bears on penalty determination, it is irrelevant to duty liability itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case