M/S SUMANGALA STEELS LIMITED vs GOVT OF UTPONDICHRY.BY ITS CHF.SECY. AND ANR. — C.A. No. 164 - 165/2013
Case under Energy Laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas : Energy Laws - Electricity, Petroleum, Oil and Natural Gas Section XII-B. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010355672010
Filing Date
08-Nov-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 164 - 165/2013
Diary Number
35567/2010
Order Date
20-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SUMANGALA STEELS LIMITED
Adv. NIRNIMESH DUBE
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVT OF UTPONDICHRY.BY ITS CHF.SECY. AND ANR.
Adv. V. G. PRAGASAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ARAVINDH S.[R-1] ARAVINDH S.[R-2]
Case History
-
20-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-May-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
22-Apr-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
12-Mar-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
11-Mar-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
11-Feb-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi
-
11-Dec-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 164 - 165/2013
Summary In Civil Appeals 164-165/2013, M/S Sumangala Steels Limited v. Government of Utpondicherry, the Supreme Court heard settlement negotiations between the parties. The Court noted that both parties confirmed a settlement proposal is under active consideration but the Government requires additional time due to a change of regime before deciding. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts