BHAGWATI HOSPITAL vs SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP . — SLP(C) No. 519/2008
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010348552007
Filing Date
30-Nov-2007
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 519/2008
Diary Number
34855/2007
Order Date
01-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGWATI HOSPITAL
Adv. NAVIN CHAWLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP .
Adv. SAHARYA & CO. RAJENDER PD. SAXENA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2007
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 519/2008
-
24-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 519/2008 - Bhagwati Hospital v. Social Jurist The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition filed by Bhagwati Hospital and consolidated related petitions against Social Jurist's public interest litigation. The Court upheld that private hospitals must provide free treatment to 25% OPD and 10% IPD patients without any charges, while permitting hospitals to meet these costs through their own funds, sponsorships, endowments, or donations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts