ESCORTS HEART INST.& RES.CENTRE LTD. vs SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP . — SLP(C) No. 522/2008
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010348342007
Filing Date
30-Nov-2007
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 522/2008
Diary Number
34834/2007
Order Date
01-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ESCORTS HEART INST.& RES.CENTRE LTD.
Adv. NAVIN CHAWLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP .
Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR RAJENDER PD. SAXENA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2007
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 522/2008
-
24-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 522/2008 - Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre Ltd. v. Social Jurist On 01/09/2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by multiple private hospitals challenging a Delhi High Court judgment requiring free treatment for patients. The Court upheld the directive that hospitals must provide 25% of OPD and 10% of IPD patients with free treatment at no charge, while allowing hospitals to meet these costs through their own funds, sponsorships, endowments, or donations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts