STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Y.MOIDEEN KUNHI(D) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 4499 - 4501/2010

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010339422008

Filing Date

21-Nov-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 4499 - 4501/2010

Diary Number

33942/2008

Order Date

27-Apr-2020

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2020 INSC 372

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Y.MOIDEEN KUNHI(D) BY LRS. .

    Adv. RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-2] RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-3] RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-4] RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-6] RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-8] RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-9] SAKSHI KAKKAR[R-7] J. M. KHANNA (Expired) [R-5]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2020

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2020

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  5. 11-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 06-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 15-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 28-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 24-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 24-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 07-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 30-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 25-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 01-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 14-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 23-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 10-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 04-May-2009

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 27-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 21-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4499 - 4501/2010

  39. [ 2020 INSC 372 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Supreme Court set aside the Karnataka High Court's judgment and Land Tribunal's orders that had exempted respondents' estate from land ceiling restrictions by treating 2,600+ acres as plantation land. The Court found critical gaps in the factual examination: the property was originally purchased by a firm (not individuals), contained 3,485 acres of forest land per the sale deed, and the transformation from forest to plantation land was never properly established. The Court directed fresh proceedings by the Tahsildar within 16 weeks to properly investigate whether Section 66 declaration was appropriate and whether the land should vest in the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case