CHAIRMAN-CUM-M.D.,COAL INDIA LD.. vs ANANTA SAHA . — C.A. No. 2958/2011

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010338102008

Filing Date

20-Nov-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 2958/2011

Diary Number

33810/2008

Order Date

01-Feb-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAIRMAN-CUM-M.D.,COAL INDIA LD..

    Adv. ANIP SACHTHEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANANTA SAHA .

    Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 20-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2958/2011

casestatus.in Summary

On 01/02/2012, the Supreme Court (Registrar S.G. Shah) heard Civil Appeal No. 2958 of 2011 between Coal India LD. and Ananta Saha. The Court criticized the Registry for leaving an unsigned withdrawal application (filed 25.5.2011) unattended for six months without proper affidavit support, declaring it "not filed at all." The Registry was directed to verify whether the review petition was already disposed by Court order dated 14.11.2011, and if so, no further action was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case