RAM PIARA (D) BY LRS. vs SHAM LAL — C.A. No. 6100/2008
Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010337442006
Filing Date
15-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 6100/2008
Diary Number
33744/2006
Order Date
10-Sep-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM PIARA (D) BY LRS.
Adv. B. SUNITA RAO
Respondent(s)
SHAM LAL
Adv. S. JANANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-Sep-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 08-Sep-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 02-Sep-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 25-Aug-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 20-Aug-2019 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Case Summary: Ram Piara (D) by LRs. v. Sham Lal The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's judgment on September 10, 2020. The case involved a property possession dispute where Ram Piara claimed possession under an agreement to sell dated 14.04.2008, but failed to plead this defense in his written statement during the respondent's possession suit. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that Ram Piara could not claim protection under Section 53(A) of the Transfer of Property Act, as he neither established willingness to perform his contractual obligations nor demonstrated good faith. The appeal was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts