<font color='red'>RAMCHARAN</font> vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT — Crl.A. No. 162/2010
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010333592009
Filing Date
03-Nov-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 162/2010
Diary Number
33359/2009
Order Date
07-Dec-2022
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2022 INSC 1259
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 08-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMCHARAN
Adv. PRAGATI NEEKHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT
Adv. PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Dec-2022
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
24-Nov-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
04-Dec-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
10-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
13-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
01-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2019
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
06-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 162/2010
-
[ 2022 INSC 1259 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
The Supreme Court acquitted accused nos. 3 (Boro) and 9 (Shyam) of murder charges, finding serious credibility issues with the main eyewitness testimony. The Court noted material contradictions between witnesses' statements, their inability to identify specific perpetrators, and suspicious omnibus accusations against all nine accused despite having been incapacitated during the fatal assault on the deceased, warranting acquittal on grounds of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts