UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARY vs DURGESH SHANKAR . — C.A. No. 1882/2010

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010330002007

Filing Date

14-Nov-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 1882/2010

Diary Number

33000/2007

Order Date

08-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismiss For Default/Want of Prosecution

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARY

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DURGESH SHANKAR .

    Adv. COAC AMIT KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Nov-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  4. 27-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 10-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Nov-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1882/2010

casestatus.in Summary

On 8th November 2017, the Supreme Court (Justices Arun Mishra and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar) dismissed Civil Appeal No. 1882/2010 filed by the Union of India against Durgesh Shankar for want of prosecution. No representative appeared for the appellant-Union of India to prosecute the appeal, though the respondent's counsel noted that Respondent No. 1 had retired in 2011 as a CBDT member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case