SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. (FORMERLY NATHPA JHAKRI POWER CORPORATION LTD.) THROUGH DY. GENERAL MANAGER (P AND A) vs TAUL DASSI — C.A. No. 7018/2011
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010323792008
Filing Date
08-Nov-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 7018/2011
Diary Number
32379/2008
Order Date
21-Nov-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. (FORMERLY NATHPA JHAKRI POWER CORPORATION LTD.) THROUGH DY. GENERAL MANAGER (P AND A)
Adv. B. K. SATIJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAUL DASSI
Adv. SHIBU DEVASIA OLICKAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Nov-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
20-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jun-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7018/2011
Case Summary: C.A. No. 007018 / 2011 The Supreme Court allowed Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.'s appeal, holding that respondents Taul Dassi were not entitled to rehabilitation scheme employment benefits. The respondents' land was acquired in 1986 with compensation disbursed in 1989, before the 1991 rehabilitation scheme was established. The Court found respondents ineligible because they owned more than five bighas of land and had already received compensation prior to the scheme's inception. The impugned Division Bench order directing the appellant to reconsider the employment application was set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts