COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEV.AUTHORITY vs N.R. LAKSHMINARAYANA . — SLP(C) No. 21089/2006
Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010322722006
Filing Date
08-Dec-2006
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 21089/2006
Diary Number
32272/2006
Order Date
24-Feb-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEV.AUTHORITY
Adv. ANKUR S. KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.N.R. LAKSHMINARAYANA .
Adv. MITTER & MITTER CO. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
26-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
01-May-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2006
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 21089/2006
On 24/02/2014, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Bangalore Development Authority against N.R. Lakshminarayana. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that BDA can take appropriate proceedings against respondents in accordance with law, but clarified that the question of respondents' title or interest in the disputed property can be agitated in an appropriate separate proceeding. A 165-day delay in filing one petition was condoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts