DHANRAJ vs VIKRAM SINGH — C.A. No. 3117/2009
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010319732008
Filing Date
05-Nov-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 3117/2009
Diary Number
31973/2008
Order Date
10-May-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHANRAJ
Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAM SINGH
Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] RANBIR SINGH YADAV[R-2] BHARTI TYAGI[R-4] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-3]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-May-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
03-May-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
27-Apr-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
26-Apr-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
13-Apr-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
31-Jan-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
24-Jan-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala
-
31-Oct-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli
-
16-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3117/2009
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003117/2009 Dhanraj v. Vikram Singh (decided 10.05.2023) The Supreme Court allowed Dhanraj's appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment that had directed implementation of PESA (Panchayat Extension of Scheduled Areas Act) provisions for 2007 Maharashtra panchayat elections. The Court held the High Court improperly examined constitutional validity of state election laws without specific pleadings challenging them and without notice to the State Advocate General. The Court rejected arguments that courts could raise validity issues sua sponte during hearings, emphasizing statutory provisions enjoy presumption of constitutionality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts