M.L.SINGH . vs ATUL GUPTA CHIEF SECTT.U.P. . — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 255/2008
Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010318582008
Filing Date
04-Nov-2008
Registration No
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 255/2008
Diary Number
31858/2008
Order Date
03-Jan-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.L.SINGH .
Adv. S. R. SETIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Respondent(s)
-
1.ATUL GUPTA CHIEF SECTT.U.P. .
Adv. SHRISH KUMAR MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VINOD KUMAR TEWARI ANUVRAT SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2008
ROPView PDF
-
08-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 255/2008
Case Summary: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 255/2008 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding that the primary issue of petitioners' absorption in government service has been completely and finally settled. The petitioners have been absorbed with effect from December 8, 1999 (their retrenchment date). Next Steps: The Court noted that petitioners raised concerns about wrongly determined seniority during hearing and directed that they remain free to challenge any order regarding seniority by approaching the High Court in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts