GUJARAT INDUST.DEV.CORP. vs MOTIBHAI JESANGHBHAI PATEL . — SLP(C) No. 4149/2009
Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010318422008
Filing Date
04-Nov-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 4149/2009
Diary Number
31842/2008
Order Date
08-Nov-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUJARAT INDUST.DEV.CORP.
Adv. ANIP SACHTHEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOTIBHAI JESANGHBHAI PATEL .
Adv. K. V. SREEKUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 4149/2009
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 004149/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all special leave petitions filed by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) challenging the Gujarat High Court's compensation determination. The Court upheld the High Court's order fixing land compensation at Rs.65/- per square meter (with statutory benefits) and tree value at Rs.700/- per tree for 32 lakh square meters of land acquired in Manjusar village, Vadodara in 1992. Key Decision: The Court rejected GIDC's argument that small-parcel land sales (Exhibits 174 and 175) couldn't determine compensation for large tracts, holding that smaller sale instances can reliably indicate market value after appropriate deductions. The 40% development cost deduction applied by the High Court was upheld as valid for infrastructure costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts