GUJARAT INDUST.DEV.CORP. vs CHEETUBHAI GORDHANBHAI PATEL . — SLP(C) No. 3235/2009
Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010318362008
Filing Date
04-Nov-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 3235/2009
Diary Number
31836/2008
Order Date
08-Nov-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUJARAT INDUST.DEV.CORP.
Adv. ANIP SACHTHEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHEETUBHAI GORDHANBHAI PATEL .
Adv. SANJAY KAPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 3235/2009
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 3235/2009 Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation v. Chhotabhai Jasanghbhai Patel The Supreme Court dismissed the Corporation's special leave petition challenging the Gujarat High Court's compensation award for land acquisition in Manjusar village, Vadodara. The High Court had fixed compensation at Rs.65/- per square meter (with statutory benefits), relying on two comparable sale instances and applying a 40% deduction for development costs. The Court upheld this valuation methodology and rejected arguments that small parcel sales couldn't determine value for large tracts, confirming Rs.700/- per tree for standing timber remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts