BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs INDIRA BAI . — C.A. No. 6523/2008

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010317712006

Filing Date

04-Dec-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 6523/2008

Diary Number

31771/2006

Order Date

28-Aug-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. AP & J CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIRA BAI .

    Adv. MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Nov-2012
  6. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2012
  8. 27-Apr-2011
  9. 26-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2011
  11. 29-Nov-2010
  12. 06-Oct-2010
  13. 29-Jul-2010
  14. 06-May-2010
  15. 06-Apr-2010
  16. 15-May-2009
  17. 03-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 16-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 05-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 13-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 16-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 30-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 08-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 15-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 08-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 04-Dec-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6523/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 6523/2008 (Bajaj Allianz v. Indira Bai) On 28 August 2014, the Supreme Court dismissed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company's appeal challenging orders directing it to pay insurance claims despite alleged breach of policy terms and vehicle permit conditions. The Court declined to interfere with the lower court orders but kept all underlying questions of law open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case