SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH . vs RAMA KANT SINGH . — C.A. No. 7486 - 7487/2008
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010313972007
Filing Date
29-Oct-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 7486 - 7487/2008
Diary Number
31397/2007
Order Date
08-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH .
Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMA KANT SINGH .
Adv. DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
14-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - IV
-
27-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
26-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7486 - 7487/2008
CASE SUMMARY In C.A. No. 007486-007487/2008 (Shyam Narayan Singh v. Rama Kant Singh), the Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeals, holding that widow Jaichha Kuwar acquired full ownership rights in the property under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Since the High Court found that Jaichha Kuwar was in possession of the property when the 1956 Act came into force and remained in continuous possession and enjoyment, she obtained absolute ownership rights in the property despite any earlier restrictions on her rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts