RAJESHWAR MAHTO (D) vs KESHAV MAHTO — C.A. No. 3404/2011
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010313702008
Filing Date
25-Oct-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 3404/2011
Diary Number
31370/2008
Order Date
26-Oct-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHWAR MAHTO (D)
Adv. ROHIT K. SINGH[P-3] ROHIT K. SINGH[P-4]
Respondent(s)
-
1.KESHAV MAHTO
Adv. SHARMILA UPADHYAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Oct-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
30-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2021
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
26-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
20-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
14-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3404/2011
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003404/2011 (Rajeshwar Mahto v. Keshav Mahto) The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on October 26, 2021, for default of appellants 1 and 2. The case involved a property dispute where appellants sought declaratory relief and injunction over 20.5 dismil of land. The trial court partially decreed the suit but excluded one katha alienated to respondent 1. The High Court further restricted relief only to the alienated portion. However, the Court found that appellants 3 and 4 (who purchased different property in 1999) were not affected by the High Court's decree, while appellant 1 had died in 2013 and appellant 2 remained unserved, leaving no proper parties to prosecute the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts