MUKHTIAR SINGH @ BITTU vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1572/2009

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010310812008

Filing Date

24-Oct-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1572/2009

Diary Number

31081/2008

Order Date

08-Jul-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKHTIAR SINGH @ BITTU

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

    Adv. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Jul-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  4. 29-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Apr-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  6. 19-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  8. 04-Dec-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Dec-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  10. 04-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Oct-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  12. 16-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 06-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 10-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 22-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 06-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 24-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1572/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 1572/2009 On July 8, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed Mukhtiar Singh @ Bittu's criminal appeal as infructuous after the State's counsel informed the court that the appellant had already completed his sentence and been released from jail, making notice service impossible. Justice Ajay Rastogi held that the appeal had become infructuous and was dismissed, while permitting the appellant to file a fresh application if he had any remaining grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case